Rush always has been an idol of mine so it is with reluctance that I sit down to write this blog.
This is Rush’s fourth marriage as I am sure that you are well aware. That means that he has been divorced four times. This is not a record by a long shot and I doubt that he will ever catch-up with Larry King no matter how hard he tries, but it certainly shows a great deal of persistence on his part. It also has made three lucky gals very wealthy women, which brings me at last to the point.
The sport that Larry King and Rush indulge in can only be played by extremely wealthy men, or women the likes of Elizabeth Taylor. The rest of us smucks are stuck with our mates come hell or high water, assuming we have two nickels to rub together. There is something very elitist about this situation that sticks in my craw.
But what really surprises me is the fact that the liberals have not tumbled to the unfairness of the whole thing, after all fairness is everything to these people. You would have thought that they would have come up with something like an multiple marriage unfairness tax in which wealthy individuals who wanted to marry more than a couple of times would have to pay ten to twenty million a pot for the privilege. Alternately, and an even more fair solution to the problem, would be some type of tax credit or tax refund for those of us who are not wealthy so that we also could benefit and enjoy the benefits of multiple marriages without suffering the consequences of the inevitable divorces inherent in the process.
Now let me address a more serious ramification of Rush’s latest union. As some of you know I spent a significant amount of my medical career treating impotent men, so I know something about male and female sexuality. Let me put this to you as simply as I can. There is no way that a 59 year old male, overweight or not, is going to be able to keep up with a 33 year old female who is just reaching her prime, with respect to sexual activity. No, unfortunately, not even a train load of Viagra is not going to solve this problem. More importantly, there is a medical risk inherent to a long term relationships of this kind. In this respect, not an insignificant number of the men in which I implanted penile prosthesis died, in the saddle so to speak, while attempting to keep their younger, and sometimes older, wives happy. We can only hope that there is a chauffeur, tennis instructor or maybe a golf instructor somewhere who can shoulder some of the load for Rush, because over the long haul this thing is not doable.
Finally, I was nearly dumb founded to learn that the flaming liberal Elton John had been paid a million bucks to perform at the wedding. The fact that this guy had been allowed within 100 miles of the wedding floored me. Certainly, there must have been a conservative performer somewhere that could have entertained this crowd. In my opinion, Rush made a statement here and it was the wrong one! My mother always used to say that you would be known by the company you kept. Well true conservatives don’t invite flaming liberals to perform at their wedding and certainly don’t pay them big bucks to do so! Well, there I have said it. It’s good to get that off my chest. By the way I am changing my will and am not leaving Rush a dime!
And what about Elton John? I am sure he didn’t need the money. How could this liberal icon agree to perform at the wedding of the most conservative ant-liberal, anti-communist in the entire world? Clearly he has a lot of “splaining” to do! I suggest, as a token of restitution, that he donate his million dollar fee to endow the new Helen Thomas chair at the Harvard School of Journalism. Alternately, he could contribute he money to the group who want to build the Helen Thomas Tower at UC Santa Cruz, or was that at UC Davis? I am always getting these two liberal indoctrination centers confused.
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment