A few Thoughts on The Zimmerman Verdict.

A recent article In our local Contra Costa Slimes written by the black liberal journalist Leonard Pitts Jr. demonstrates, once again, how divorced from reality the liberal press is in this country. The same can be said for the demorats and their simple minded constituents who have been in control of our government, except for a few short years in the 1980s, for the past 60 plus years. Mr. Pitts begins his article by criticizing Florida's stand your ground statute which, of course, is an entirely spurious argument since this was a case of self defense, nothing more nothing less! After all, a person has a right to defend himself when someone is trying to beat him to death in every state in the union, even California! The problem is that the prosecutors of Mr. Zimmerman, and the liberal press, simply couldn't equate screams for help, a broken nose and scalp lacerations with the need for Zimmerman to defend himself from the blows being rained down on him from the hooded monster who was attaching him. After this silly attempt at journalism Mr. Pitts, who insists on digging himself into a deeper and deeper hole, by asking two questions. First, "Why did Zimmerman regard Trayvon Martin as suspicious when all he did was wear a hooded sweatshirt while walking in the rain?" Second Mr. Pitts wonders "Why was Mr. Zimmerman able to go home that same night?" The answer to both questions is pretty simple and straight forward. The community in which Zimmerman lived has been plagued recently by multiple robberies and burglaries, that's why they organized a watch patrol. More to the point, these crimes were invariably committed by young black hoodlums, not by whites or people of any other color but black. Furthermore, young black men from the hood often wear hooded sweatshirts, that's one of the reasons they are called hoodlums, Mr. Pitts (well, not really, I just made that one up, couldn't help myself). As to the assertion that Zimmerman should have been locked up from the get go, there was no evidence, then or now, that Mr. Zimmerman was acting in anything but self-defense; thus, the cops had no reason to arrest him. After all, walking around your neighborhood looking for black men who are up to no good is not a crime in the United States of America, not yet anyway. In fact, it was nearly a month before charges were brought by the an out of town racist prosecutor appointed by the brain-dead republican governor of Florida, Rick Scott. Obviously, the cooked up charge of second-degree murder, a stretch of the imagination if I ever saw one, was only made to pacify race-baiters like Jessie HiJackson, the Reverend Al Sharpton, Obama and our clueless raciest Attorney General, Erick Holder. It took him six paragraphs, but Pitts finally stumbled onto the truth when he lamented that "But truth is, race has been there at every turn." Yes, the ridiculous charge of second degree brought against the Hispanic man George Zimmerman (the press insists on calling him white even though he is no more white than is our first black president Barack Hussein Obama) was entirely based on black racism leveled at anyone who, by any twisted sort of reasoning, can be labeled as white. Let the witch hunts begin! By the way, Mr. Pitts, many of us whites consider, as you say, "Black to be the natural color of criminality." That's because blacks are seven times more likely to commit murder and eight times more likely to commit burglaries than are all other races combined! Somehow, you neglected to mention this statistic in your article, Mr. Pitts. I wonder why? Yes, after 60 years of Johnson's great society and 50 plus years of affirmative action, nothing has changed. The vast majority of blacks are still as illiterate as his girl friend, Rachel Jeantel ( who claims to have a B average in high school but can't read or write) and the majority of young black males are still either in prison or on parole.